David John Mead
Living and working on the web, with a British point of view
-
The iPad…It’s not about the hardware
(1)Ask anyone and they’ll tell you I’m no MAC fan boy. Don’t get me wrong, I love my iPod (I won it as a door prize) and even contemplated getting an iPhone once ’cause I think they’re cool. But the announcement of the iPad left me nonplussed.
As Chris wrote
I cannot deny that it’s pretty. It’s very pretty. Shiny, too.
but there was enough missing (no built-in camera for starters!) that I’m sure we’ll see the next version by Xmas, especially with the JooJoo launching soon. More than that though, I think there’s more to Apple going down this path than just producing a big iTouch.It’s got to be all about content. With the iPad you can run virtually all the apps currently available through the App Store as well as any on your iPhone/iTouch, a lot of which are glorified ways of consuming content from 3rd parties. They have a new book store for downloading books. And of course you have the iTunes Store with all that music, TV shows, and movies. Soon you’ll be able to subscribe to magazines and newspapers (which featured heavily in the video) through the store too. And as with the iPhone its all locked down.
There was also talk of it being
the best web surfing experience
from Rob Schiller. I assume that’s the best without Flash, seeing as that is missing from the iPad. And why include it? Apple has conditioned all of its iPhone & iTouch users to do without for the past few years and Safari is the first browser to support the new HTML5 audio & video tags, so why bother with it now.Don’t get me wrong. If Messrs Jobs & co. sent me a free one to try I’m sure I’d love it. But for $500 it’s got to do a lot more than be a easy way to consume content from the iTunes Store.
Technorati tags: apple, ipad, mac
Blogged with the Flock Browserapple, ipad, mac -
So Ricky Gervais gave up on Twitter…
(0)…and more power to him. You could tell from his first tweet that this wasn’t his idea, and his last one put paid to the idea that he’d be using twitter anytime soon. Floated as a way to promote his hosting of the upcoming Golden Globes he just didn’t seem to see the point and said so on his blog (you may have to scroll to week 100 as I can’t link to individual posts).
If I want to tell a friend, famous or otherwise what I had to eat this morning, I’ll text them.
And that’s why I say more power to him. He gets online media. He’s been podcasting, blogging, and vlogging for sometime. All with a specific project or purpose in mind. He’s found the methods that work for him and work very well too. Why distill the message for the sake of using the “fad-du-jour”?
Technorati tags: goldenglobes, tweet, rickygervais, twitter
Blogged with the Flock Browsergoldenglobes, rickygervais, tweet, twitter
