<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn applications are here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidjohnmead.com/2008/10/29/linkedin-applications-are-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidjohnmead.com/2008/10/29/linkedin-applications-are-here/</link>
	<description>Living and working on the web, with a British point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:53:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Mead</title>
		<link>http://davidjohnmead.com/2008/10/29/linkedin-applications-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjohnmead.com/?p=15#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi John,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know what you mean.  Though a Twitter fan I do appreciate that LinkedIn has remained fairly uncluttered.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can see the SlideShare integration being useful (I have set up), but some of the other apps that are sure to come along will chip away at its simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I know what you mean.  Though a Twitter fan I do appreciate that LinkedIn has remained fairly uncluttered.</p>
<p>I can see the SlideShare integration being useful (I have set up), but some of the other apps that are sure to come along will chip away at its simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ettorre</title>
		<link>http://davidjohnmead.com/2008/10/29/linkedin-applications-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ettorre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjohnmead.com/?p=15#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Actually, for some people (myself decidedly among them) all that added functionality and those doo dads will make Linkedin less useful and interesting. We liked it primarily because it was more focused as a business tool for people who are serious about connecting for business purposes, and didn&#039;t (and still don&#039;t) want to be bothered with all the extras, or have to spend any additional seconds figuring out the new parts of the tool. For those who find Facebook (or, egad, Twitter) useful, I say great, by all means use them. But I&#039;d prefer that Linkedin stop trying to be like those other tools, and concentrate more on what it does better, and differently. Anyway, good luck in your new life at Progressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, for some people (myself decidedly among them) all that added functionality and those doo dads will make Linkedin less useful and interesting. We liked it primarily because it was more focused as a business tool for people who are serious about connecting for business purposes, and didn&#8217;t (and still don&#8217;t) want to be bothered with all the extras, or have to spend any additional seconds figuring out the new parts of the tool. For those who find Facebook (or, egad, Twitter) useful, I say great, by all means use them. But I&#8217;d prefer that Linkedin stop trying to be like those other tools, and concentrate more on what it does better, and differently. Anyway, good luck in your new life at Progressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
